Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Apple - Mac mini M4 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | 500 GB | 256 GB |
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |
| Thunderbolt | false | true |
| Volume | 0.4 L | 0.34 L |
Between the EQ14 and Mac mini M4, the EQ14 comes out ahead in storage / tdp, while the Mac mini M4 wins on thunderbolt / volume. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the Mac mini M4 scores 64.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The EQ14 edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 64.1), but the 3.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EQ14 if you care most about storage / tdp. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, tdp. The single most decisive one: Storage — 95.31% more. 500 GB vs 256 GB.
Pick the Mac mini M4 if you care most about thunderbolt / volume. Its strongest claims are thunderbolt, volume. The single most decisive one: Has Thunderbolt.
Both ship with comparable ram, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Beelink - EQ14 or Apple - Mac mini M4?
Beelink - EQ14 leads the current Mars Score by 3.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare storage, volume, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Beelink - EQ14 if…
Beelink - EQ14 has the measurable edge on storage gb, tdp w.
Choose Apple - Mac mini M4 if…
Apple - Mac mini M4 has the measurable edge on has thunderbolt, volume l.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Beelink - EQ14 wins
- ▲Storage — 95.31% more. 500 GB vs 256 GB.
- ▲TDP — 50.00 W less. 15 vs 65.
Why Apple - Mac mini M4 wins
- ▲Has Thunderbolt.
- ▲Volume — 0.06 L less. 0.34 vs 0.4.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Apple - Mac mini M4 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.4 L | 0.34 Llead |
| Weight | 0.45 kglead | 0.67 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 15 Wlead | 65 W |
| USB ports | 5 | 5 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | truelead |