Between the SER9 HX 370 and Mac mini M4 Pro, the SER9 HX 370 comes out ahead in storage / ram, while the Mac mini M4 Pro wins on thunderbolt / volume. Overall, the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 and the Mac mini M4 Pro scores 69.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 69.1). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, ram.
Pick the Mac mini M4 Pro if you care most about thunderbolt / volume. Its strongest claims are thunderbolt, volume.
Both ship with comparable tdp, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲Storage — 100.00% more. 1024 GB vs 512 GB.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 32 GB vs 24 GB.
Why Apple - Mac mini M4 Pro wins
- ▲Has Thunderbolt.
- ▲Volume — 0.56 L less. 0.34 vs 0.9.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 | Apple - Mac mini M4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.9 L | 0.34 Llead |
| Weight | 0.85 kg | 0.73 kglead |
| TDPⓘ | 65 W | 65 W |
| USB ports | 6lead | 5 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | truelead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.