Bissell - IconPet Edge vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Bissell - IconPet Edge | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 130 | 175 |
| Battery | 50 min | 60 min |
| Weight | 3.4 kg | 3.5 kg |
Between the IconPet Edge and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the IconPet Edge comes out ahead in weight, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on suction (aw) / battery. Overall, the IconPet Edge scores 69.9 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.9 vs 75.6), but the 5.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the IconPet Edge if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.4 vs 3.5.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you care most about suction (aw) / battery. Its strongest claims are suction (aw), battery. The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 34.62% more. 175 vs 130.
Both ship with comparable dustbin, cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Cordless Pro IZ862H is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Bissell - IconPet Edge or Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H?
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H leads the current Mars Score by 5.7 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Bissell - IconPet Edge if…
Bissell - IconPet Edge has the measurable edge on weight kg.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on suction aw, battery min.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Bissell - IconPet Edge wins
- ▲Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.4 vs 3.5.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 34.62% more. 175 vs 130.
- ▲Battery — 20.00% more. 60 min vs 50 min.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Bissell - IconPet Edge | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 130 | 175lead |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Bissell - IconPet Edge | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.4 kglead | 3.5 kg |
| Battery | 50 min | 60 minlead |