Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Boox - Page | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Weight | 195 g | 480 g |
| Screen size | 7 " | 10.3 " |
| Color screen | false | true |
Between the Page and Tab Ultra C Pro, the Page comes out ahead in weight, while the Tab Ultra C Pro wins on storage / screen size. Overall, the Page scores 71.7 and the Tab Ultra C Pro scores 84.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Tab Ultra C Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Page if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 285.00 g less. 195 vs 480.
Pick the Tab Ultra C Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are storage, screen size, color screen. The single most decisive one: Storage — 300.00% more. 128 GB vs 32 GB.
Both ship with comparable resolution, waterproof, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Tab Ultra C Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Boox - Page or Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro?
Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro leads the current Mars Score by 12.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, storage, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Boox - Page if…
Boox - Page has the measurable edge on weight g.
Choose Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro if…
Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro has the measurable edge on storage gb, screen size in, has color screen.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Boox - Page wins
- ▲Weight — 285.00 g less. 195 vs 480.
Why Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro wins
- ▲Storage — 300.00% more. 128 GB vs 32 GB.
- ▲Screen size — 47.14% more. 10.3 " vs 7 ".
- ▲Has Color screen.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Boox - Page | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 " | 10.3 "lead |
| Resolution | 300 ppi | 300 ppi |
| Color screen | false | truelead |
| Warm light | true | true |
Design
| Spec | Boox - Page | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 glead | 480 g |
| Waterproof | false | false |
| Page-turn buttons | truelead | false |
Storage & Battery
| Spec | Boox - Page | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Storageⓘ | 32 GB | 128 GBlead |
| Battery life | 4 weekslead | 2 weeks |