Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Boox - Palma 2 | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 170 g | 480 g |
| Screen size | 6.13 " | 10.3 " |
| Color screen | false | true |
Between the Palma 2 and Tab Ultra C Pro, the Palma 2 comes out ahead in weight, while the Tab Ultra C Pro wins on screen size / color screen. Overall, the Palma 2 scores 83 and the Tab Ultra C Pro scores 84.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (83 vs 84.3). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Palma 2 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 310.00 g less. 170 vs 480.
Pick the Tab Ultra C Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, color screen. The single most decisive one: Screen size — 68.03% more. 10.3 " vs 6.13 ".
Both ship with comparable resolution, storage, waterproof, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Boox - Palma 2 or Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro?
Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro leads the current Mars Score by 1.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Boox - Palma 2 if…
Boox - Palma 2 has the measurable edge on weight g.
Choose Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro if…
Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro has the measurable edge on screen size in, has color screen.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Boox - Palma 2 wins
- ▲Weight — 310.00 g less. 170 vs 480.
Why Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro wins
- ▲Screen size — 68.03% more. 10.3 " vs 6.13 ".
- ▲Has Color screen.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Boox - Palma 2 | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.13 " | 10.3 "lead |
| Resolution | 300 ppi | 300 ppi |
| Color screen | false | truelead |
| Warm light | true | true |
Design
| Spec | Boox - Palma 2 | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 170 glead | 480 g |
| Waterproof | false | false |
| Page-turn buttons | false | false |
Storage & Battery
| Spec | Boox - Palma 2 | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Storageⓘ | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Battery life | 2 weeks | 2 weeks |