Between the Tab Ultra C Pro and Elipsa 2E, the Tab Ultra C Pro comes out ahead in storage and resolution, while the Elipsa 2E wins on weight. Overall, the Tab Ultra C Pro scores 95 and the Elipsa 2E scores 69.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Tab Ultra C Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 25.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Tab Ultra C Pro if you care most about storage and resolution. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, resolution, color screen.
Pick the Elipsa 2E if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight.
Both ship with comparable screen size, waterproof, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Tab Ultra C Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro wins
- ▲Storage — 300.00% more. 128 GB vs 32 GB.
- ▲Resolution — 32.16% more. 300 ppi vs 227 ppi.
- ▲Has Color screen.
Why Kobo - Elipsa 2E wins
- ▲Weight — 90.00 g less. 390 vs 480.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro | Kobo - Elipsa 2E |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 10.3 " | 10.3 " |
| Resolution | 300 ppilead | 227 ppi |
| Color screen | truelead | false |
| Warm light | true | true |
Design
| Spec | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro | Kobo - Elipsa 2E |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 480 g | 390 glead |
| Waterproof | false | false |
| Page-turn buttons | false | false |
Storage & Battery
| Spec | Boox - Tab Ultra C Pro | Kobo - Elipsa 2E |
|---|---|---|
| Storageⓘ | 128 GBlead | 32 GB |
| Battery life | 2 weeks | 6 weekslead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.