Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw vs Epson - EcoTank ET-2850
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw | Epson - EcoTank ET-2850 |
|---|---|---|
| Pages/min (color) | 23 | 5 |
| Pages/min (mono) | 23 | 10.5 |
| ADF | true | false |
Between the imageCLASS MF656Cdw and EcoTank ET-2850, the imageCLASS MF656Cdw comes out ahead in pages/min (color) / pages/min (mono), while the EcoTank ET-2850 wins on several specs. Overall, the imageCLASS MF656Cdw scores 71.8 and the EcoTank ET-2850 scores 63.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The imageCLASS MF656Cdw is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the imageCLASS MF656Cdw if you care most about pages/min (color) / pages/min (mono). The biggest gaps in its favor are pages/min (color), pages/min (mono), adf. The single most decisive one: Pages/min (color) — 360.00% more. 23 vs 5.
The EcoTank ET-2850 similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable color, auto duplex, airprint, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the imageCLASS MF656Cdw is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw or Epson - EcoTank ET-2850?
Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw leads the current Mars Score by 8.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare pages/min (mono), pages/min (color) against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw if…
Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw has the measurable edge on ppm color, ppm mono, has adf.
Choose Epson - EcoTank ET-2850 if…
Epson - EcoTank ET-2850 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw wins
- ▲Pages/min (color) — 360.00% more. 23 vs 5.
- ▲Pages/min (mono) — 119.05% more. 23 vs 10.5.
- ▲Has ADF.
Why Epson - EcoTank ET-2850 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw | Epson - EcoTank ET-2850 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Laser AIO (color) | Inkjet AIO |
| Color | true | true |
| Pages/min (mono) | 23lead | 10.5 |
| Pages/min (color) | 23lead | 5 |
| Resolution | 1200x1200 dpi | 5760x1440 dpi |
| Max paper size | Letter | Letter |
Features
| Spec | Canon - imageCLASS MF656Cdw | Epson - EcoTank ET-2850 |
|---|---|---|
| Auto duplex | true | true |
| ADF | truelead | false |
| Wi-Fiⓘ | true | true |
| AirPrint | true | true |