Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Weight

EOS R1 vs Z f

A side-by-side readout for weight.

Buyer's guide

What weight means for this matchup

Weight is a measured value in g. On this field, Nikon - Z f has the advantage because the lower value is preferred.Treat this page as one decision slice, then return to the full comparison before making a purchase.

Canon - EOS R1
1115 g
Nikon - Z f
710 g
Canon · EOS R1
1115g
Nikon · Z f
710g
lead
VerdictZ f wins on weight.
Context

Understanding weight

Weight is a numeric spec measured in g. On this metric, lower values are generally better — smaller, lighter, thinner, or less demanding usually translates to a more comfortable or more efficient product. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs weight together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchupEOS R1's 1115g is roughly 57% more than Z f's 710g (a 405g gap). Lower is better here, so Z f takes the lead in real use.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Cameras category for all products ranked by Mars Score.