Between the EOS R5 C and FX30, the EOS R5 C comes out ahead in xlr input / max video, while the FX30 wins on several specs. Overall, the EOS R5 C scores 35 and the FX30 scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes; the decision sits on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the EOS R5 C if you care most about xlr input / max video. The biggest gaps in its favor are xlr input, max video, sensor size.
The FX30 similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable optical zoom, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Canon - EOS R5 C wins
- ▲Has XLR input.
- ▲Max video: 8K (vs 4K120).
- ▲Sensor size: Full Frame (vs APS-C).
Why Sony - FX30 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R5 C | Sony - FX30 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 8Klead | 4K120 |
| Optical zoom | 0 | 0 |
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Full Framelead | APS-C |
Audio
| Spec | Canon - EOS R5 C | Sony - FX30 |
|---|---|---|
| XLR input | truelead | false |
| Headphone jack | true | true |
Design
| Spec | Canon - EOS R5 C | Sony - FX30 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 770 g | 646 glead |
| Articulating screen | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.