Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - CMF Phone 1 vs Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra

Last updated · How Mars Score works
CMF Phone 1NOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
CMF Phone 1
61.4/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Razr 50 UltraMOTOROLARENDER
Probe B
Motorola
Razr 50 Ultra
65.6/ 100C
Performance64· 25%
Battery50· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the CMF Phone 1 and Razr 50 Ultra, the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in battery capacity, while the Razr 50 Ultra wins on antutu / front camera. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the Razr 50 Ultra scores 65.6 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Razr 50 Ultra edges ahead on the Mars Score (61.4 vs 65.6), but the 4.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the CMF Phone 1 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery capacity.

Pick the Razr 50 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, front camera, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, 5g support, headphone jack, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Nothing - CMF Phone 1 wins

  • Battery capacity — 25.00% more. 5000 mAh vs 4000 mAh.

Why Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra wins

  • AnTuTu — 187.50% more. 1610000 vs 560000.
  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Wired charging — 36.36% more. 45 W vs 33 W.
  • Weight — 8.00 g less. 189 vs 197.
  • Pixel density — 4.56% more. 413 ppi vs 395 ppi.
  • Screen size — 3.45% more. 6.9 " vs 6.67 ".
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Weight197 g189 glead
Thickness8.2 mm7.1 mmlead
Water resistanceIP52IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_clamshelllead

Display

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Screen size6.67 "6.9 "lead
Pixel density395 ppi413 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hzlead
Peak brightness2000 nits3000 nitslead

Performance

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu5600001610000lead
CPU total clock9.0 GHz16.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationfalsetruelead

Battery

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
Battery capacity5000 mAhlead4000 mAh
Wired charging33 W45 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W15 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slottrueleadfalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates2 years3 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

CMF Phone 1 has 25.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 4000 mAh.

Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra is 8g lighter — 197g vs 189g.

Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+

CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.

Does Razr 50 Ultra support 5G?+

Yes, Razr 50 Ultra supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, CMF Phone 1 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or Razr 50 Ultra?+

Razr 50 Ultra has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.