Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 | AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 6 |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 32 MB |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 18200 | 16800 |
| Boost clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
Between the Core Ultra 5 225 and Ryzen 5 9600, the Core Ultra 5 225 comes out ahead in cores / cinebench r23 (multi), while the Ryzen 5 9600 wins on l3 cache / boost clock. Overall, the Core Ultra 5 225 scores 47.8 and the Ryzen 5 9600 scores 48 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (47.8 vs 48). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Core Ultra 5 225 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are cores, cinebench r23 (multi). The single most decisive one: Cores — 66.67% more. 10 vs 6.
Pick the Ryzen 5 9600 if you care most about l3 cache / boost clock. Its strongest claims are l3 cache, boost clock. The single most decisive one: L3 cache — 60.00% more. 32 MB vs 20 MB.
Both ship with comparable tdp, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 or AMD - Ryzen 5 9600?
AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 leads the current Mars Score by 0.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare cores, boost clock against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 if…
Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 has the measurable edge on core count, cinebench r23 multi.
Choose AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 if…
AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 has the measurable edge on cache l3 mb, boost clock ghz.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 wins
- ▲Cores — 66.67% more. 10 vs 6.
- ▲Cinebench R23 (multi) — 8.33% more. 18200 vs 16800.
Why AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 wins
- ▲L3 cache — 60.00% more. 32 MB vs 20 MB.
- ▲Boost clock — 6.12% more. 5.2 GHz vs 4.9 GHz.
Spec comparison
Cores
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 | AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Coresⓘ | 10lead | 6 |
| Threadsⓘ | 10 | 12lead |
| Base clockⓘ | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHzlead |
| Boost clockⓘ | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHzlead |
| L3 cacheⓘ | 20 MB | 32 MBlead |
Platform
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 | AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socketⓘ | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| TDPⓘ | 65 W | 65 W |
| Integrated graphicsⓘ | true | true |
| DDR5ⓘ | true | true |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 | AMD - Ryzen 5 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 (multi)ⓘ | 18200lead | 16800 |
| Cinebench R23 (single)ⓘ | 1980 | 2080lead |