Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V vs Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V | Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 16 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 24 MB |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 11400 | 21500 |
| TDP | 30 W | 45 W |
| Boost clock | 5.0 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
Between the Core Ultra 7 268V and Core Ultra 9 285H, the Core Ultra 7 268V comes out ahead in tdp, while the Core Ultra 9 285H wins on cores / l3 cache. Overall, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 45 and the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 51.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Core Ultra 9 285H edges ahead on the Mars Score (45 vs 51.2), but the 6.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Core Ultra 7 268V if you care most about tdp. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp. The single most decisive one: TDP — 15.00 W less. 30 vs 45.
Pick the Core Ultra 9 285H if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are cores, l3 cache, cinebench r23 (multi), among others. The single most decisive one: Cores — 100.00% more. 16 vs 8.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Core Ultra 9 285H is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V or Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H?
Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H leads the current Mars Score by 6.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare cores, boost clock, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V if…
Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V has the measurable edge on tdp w.
Choose Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H if…
Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H has the measurable edge on core count, cache l3 mb, cinebench r23 multi.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V wins
- ▲TDP — 15.00 W less. 30 vs 45.
Why Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H wins
- ▲Cores — 100.00% more. 16 vs 8.
- ▲L3 cache — 100.00% more. 24 MB vs 12 MB.
- ▲Cinebench R23 (multi) — 88.60% more. 21500 vs 11400.
- ▲Boost clock — 8.00% more. 5.4 GHz vs 5.0 GHz.
Spec comparison
Cores
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V | Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Coresⓘ | 8 | 16lead |
| Threadsⓘ | 8 | 16lead |
| Base clockⓘ | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHzlead |
| Boost clockⓘ | 5.0 GHz | 5.4 GHzlead |
| L3 cacheⓘ | 12 MB | 24 MBlead |
Platform
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V | Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Socketⓘ | BGA2833 | BGA |
| TDPⓘ | 30 Wlead | 45 W |
| Integrated graphicsⓘ | true | true |
| DDR5ⓘ | true | true |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Intel - Core Ultra 7 268V | Intel - Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 (multi)ⓘ | 11400 | 21500lead |
| Cinebench R23 (single)ⓘ | 1860 | 2050lead |