Cosori - Lite 4.0 Qt vs Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827
Between the Lite 4.0 Qt and Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827, the Lite 4.0 Qt comes out ahead in max temperature, while the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins on capacity / wattage. Overall, the Lite 4.0 Qt scores 63.1 and the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 scores 55.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Lite 4.0 Qt edges ahead on the Mars Score (63.1 vs 55.5), but the 7.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Lite 4.0 Qt if you care most about max temperature. The biggest gaps in its favor are max temperature.
Pick the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 if you care most about capacity / wattage. Its strongest claims are capacity, wattage.
Both ship with comparable dual zone, presets, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Lite 4.0 Qt is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Cosori - Lite 4.0 Qt wins
- ▲Max temperature — 15.00% more. 230 °C vs 200 °C.
Why Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins
- ▲Capacity — 10.53% more. 4.2 L vs 3.8 L.
- ▲Wattage — 3.33% more. 1550 W vs 1500 W.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Cosori - Lite 4.0 Qt | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3.8 L | 4.2 Llead |
| Dual zone | false | false |
Power
| Spec | Cosori - Lite 4.0 Qt | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 1500 W | 1550 Wlead |
| Max temperature | 230 °Clead | 200 °C |
Features
| Spec | Cosori - Lite 4.0 Qt | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Presets | 9 | 9 |
| Smart app | false | false |
| Dishwasher-safe | true | true |
| Noise | 52 dBlead | 58 dB |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.