Between the TOA-65 and Profile Smart Air Fryer, the TOA-65 comes out ahead in wattage / capacity, while the Profile Smart Air Fryer wins on several specs. Overall, the TOA-65 scores 68.7 and the Profile Smart Air Fryer scores 56.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The TOA-65 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the TOA-65 if you care most about wattage / capacity. The biggest gaps in its favor are wattage, capacity, max temperature.
The Profile Smart Air Fryer similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable dual zone, presets, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the TOA-65 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Cuisinart - TOA-65 wins
- ▲Wattage — 20.00% more. 1800 W vs 1500 W.
- ▲Capacity — 14.00% more. 5.7 L vs 5 L.
- ▲Max temperature — 13.73% more. 232 °C vs 204 °C.
Why GE - Profile Smart Air Fryer wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Cuisinart - TOA-65 | GE - Profile Smart Air Fryer |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5.7 Llead | 5 L |
| Dual zone | false | false |
Power
| Spec | Cuisinart - TOA-65 | GE - Profile Smart Air Fryer |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 1800 Wlead | 1500 W |
| Max temperature | 232 °Clead | 204 °C |
Features
| Spec | Cuisinart - TOA-65 | GE - Profile Smart Air Fryer |
|---|---|---|
| Presets | 8 | 8 |
| Smart app | false | truelead |
| Dishwasher-safe | true | true |
| Noise | 62 dB | 60 dBlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.