Cuisinart - TOA-65 vs Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827
Between the TOA-65 and Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827, the TOA-65 comes out ahead in capacity / wattage, while the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins on presets. Overall, the TOA-65 scores 68.7 and the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 scores 55.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The TOA-65 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 13.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the TOA-65 if you care most about capacity / wattage. The biggest gaps in its favor are capacity, wattage, max temperature.
Pick the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 if you care most about presets. Its strongest claims are presets.
Both ship with comparable dual zone, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the TOA-65 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Cuisinart - TOA-65 wins
- ▲Capacity — 35.71% more. 5.7 L vs 4.2 L.
- ▲Wattage — 16.13% more. 1800 W vs 1550 W.
- ▲Max temperature — 16.00% more. 232 °C vs 200 °C.
Why Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins
- ▲Presets — 1.00 more. 9 vs 8.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Cuisinart - TOA-65 | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5.7 Llead | 4.2 L |
| Dual zone | false | false |
Power
| Spec | Cuisinart - TOA-65 | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 1800 Wlead | 1550 W |
| Max temperature | 232 °Clead | 200 °C |
Features
| Spec | Cuisinart - TOA-65 | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Presets | 8 | 9lead |
| Smart app | false | false |
| Dishwasher-safe | true | true |
| Noise | 62 dB | 58 dBlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.