Skip to content
vsMars
Direktvergleich

Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Realme - GT 7 Pro

Zuletzt aktualisiert · Wie der Mars Score funktioniert
Galaxy S26 UltraSAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S26 Ultra
75.6/ 100B
Performance77· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras92· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
GT 7 ProREALMERENDER
Probe B
Realme
GT 7 Pro
73.2/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Schnelles Urteil

Between the Galaxy S26 Ultra and GT 7 Pro, the Galaxy S26 Ultra comes out ahead in main camera and pixel density, while the GT 7 Pro wins on wireless charging and wired charging. Overall, the Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 75.6 and the GT 7 Pro scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.

Kaufberatung

Welches solltest du kaufen?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 73.2). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Galaxy S26 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are main camera, pixel density, screen size, among others.

Pick the GT 7 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, front camera, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Warum Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra gewinnt

  • Main camera — 300.00% more. 200 MP vs 50 MP.
  • Pixel density — 11.33% more. 501 ppi vs 450 ppi.
  • Screen size — 1.77% more. 6.9 " vs 6.78 ".
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 4).

Warum Realme - GT 7 Pro gewinnt

  • Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.
  • Wired charging — 84.62% more. 120 W vs 65 W.
  • Front camera — 33.33% more. 16 MP vs 12 MP.
  • AnTuTu — 16.02% more. 2680000 vs 2310000.
  • Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • Weight — 9.20 g less. 222.8 vs 232.
Komplette Daten

Spec-Vergleich

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
Weight232 g222.8 glead
Thickness8.6 mm8.55 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
Screen size6.9 "lead6.78 "
Pixel density501 ppilead450 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits6500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
AnTuTu23100002680000lead
CPU total clock22.8 GHz22.8 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
Main camera200 MPlead50 MP
Front camera12 MP16 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
Battery capacity5000 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging65 W120 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraRealme - GT 7 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead4 years
Leserfragen

Häufig gefragt

Which has better battery, Galaxy S26 Ultra or GT 7 Pro?+

GT 7 Pro has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S26 Ultra or GT 7 Pro?+

GT 7 Pro is 9g lighter — 232g vs 222.8g.

Is Galaxy S26 Ultra waterproof?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra has an IP68 rating.

Does GT 7 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, GT 7 Pro supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S26 Ultra or GT 7 Pro?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 200 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Im Detail

Spec-Detailanalysen

Nach Hersteller

Mehr von denselben Marken

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.