Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro vs Vivo - X200
Between the X Fold 3 Pro and X200, the X Fold 3 Pro comes out ahead in wireless charging and ram, while the X200 wins on weight and antutu. Overall, the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Welches solltest du kaufen?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.1 vs 71.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, ram, screen size, among others.
Pick the X200 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are weight, antutu, pixel density, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Warum Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro gewinnt
- ▲Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 50 W vs 30 W.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
- ▲Screen size — 20.39% more. 8.03 " vs 6.67 ".
- ▲Wired charging — 11.11% more. 100 W vs 90 W.
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
Warum Vivo - X200 gewinnt
- ▲Weight — 34.00 g less. 202 vs 236.
- ▲AnTuTu — 26.57% more. 2620000 vs 2070000.
- ▲Pixel density — 14.43% more. 460 ppi vs 402 ppi.
- ▲Battery capacity — 1.75% more. 5800 mAh vs 5700 mAh.
Spec-Vergleich
Design
| Spec | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 236 g | 202 glead |
| Thickness | 11.2 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8lead | IP68 |
| Form factor | foldable_booklead | bar |
Display
| Spec | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 8.03 "lead | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 402 ppi | 460 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5700 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 100 Wlead | 90 W |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 50 Wlead | 30 W |
Connectivity
| Spec | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 4 years | 4 years |
Häufig gefragt
Which has better battery, X Fold 3 Pro or X200?+
X200 has 1.8% more battery — 5700 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, X Fold 3 Pro or X200?+
X200 is 34g lighter — 236g vs 202g.
Is X Fold 3 Pro waterproof?+
X Fold 3 Pro has an IPX8 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, X Fold 3 Pro or X200?+
X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, X Fold 3 Pro or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-Detailanalysen
Mehr von denselben Marken
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.