Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 vs Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 | Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CADR | 350 m³/h | 500 m³/h |
Between the Purifier Cool TP10 and Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro, the Purifier Cool TP10 comes out ahead in several specs, while the Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro wins on cadr. Overall, the Purifier Cool TP10 scores 74 and the Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro scores 76.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (74 vs 76.7). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The Purifier Cool TP10 does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro if you care most about cadr. Its strongest claims are cadr. The single most decisive one: CADR — 42.86% more. 500 m³/h vs 350 m³/h.
Both ship with comparable coverage, true hepa h13+, activated carbon, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 or Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro?
Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro leads the current Mars Score by 2.7 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare cadr against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 if…
Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro if…
Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro has the measurable edge on cadr m3h.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro wins
- ▲CADR — 42.86% more. 500 m³/h vs 350 m³/h.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 | Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CADR | 350 m³/h | 500 m³/hlead |
| Coverage | 60 m² | 60 m² |
| True HEPA H13+ | true | true |
| Activated carbon | true | true |
Smart & Noise
| Spec | Dyson - Purifier Cool TP10 | Xiaomi - Mi Smart Air Purifier 4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Min noise | 32 dB | 32 dB |
| Air quality sensor | true | true |
| Smart app | true | true |