Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 240 | 175 |
| Dustbin | 0.77 L | 0.7 L |
Between the V15s Detect Submarine and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the V15s Detect Submarine comes out ahead in suction (aw) / dustbin, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on several specs. Overall, the V15s Detect Submarine scores 83.9 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The V15s Detect Submarine is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the V15s Detect Submarine if you care most about suction (aw) / dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw), dustbin. The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 37.14% more. 240 vs 175.
The Cordless Pro IZ862H similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable battery, cordless, weight, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the V15s Detect Submarine is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine or Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H?
Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine leads the current Mars Score by 8.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw) against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine if…
Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine has the measurable edge on suction aw, dustbin l.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 37.14% more. 240 vs 175.
- ▲Dustbin — 10.00% more. 0.77 L vs 0.7 L.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 240lead | 175 |
| Dustbin | 0.77 Llead | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA H13 | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Dyson - V15s Detect Submarine | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wet/dry cordlesslead | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 3.5 kg |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |