Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Lamzu - Thorn |
|---|---|---|
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 4000 Hz |
| Max DPI | 26000 | 30000 |
| Battery | 90 h | 80 h |
| Weight | 63 g | 52 g |
Between the XM2we and Thorn, the XM2we comes out ahead in battery, while the Thorn wins on polling rate / max dpi. Overall, the XM2we scores 62.6 and the Thorn scores 70.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Thorn edges ahead on the Mars Score (62.6 vs 70.5), but the 7.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the XM2we if you care most about battery. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery. The single most decisive one: Battery — 12.50% more. 90 h vs 80 h.
Pick the Thorn if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are polling rate, max dpi, weight. The single most decisive one: Polling rate — 300.00% more. 4000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
Both ship with comparable wireless, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Thorn is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Endgame Gear - XM2we or Lamzu - Thorn?
Lamzu - Thorn leads the current Mars Score by 7.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, polling rate, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Endgame Gear - XM2we if…
Endgame Gear - XM2we has the measurable edge on battery h.
Choose Lamzu - Thorn if…
Lamzu - Thorn has the measurable edge on polling rate hz, max dpi, weight g.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Endgame Gear - XM2we wins
- ▲Battery — 12.50% more. 90 h vs 80 h.
Why Lamzu - Thorn wins
- ▲Polling rate — 300.00% more. 4000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Max DPI — 15.38% more. 30000 vs 26000.
- ▲Weight — 11.00 g less. 52 vs 63.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Lamzu - Thorn |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 30000lead |
| Max IPS | 650 | 750lead |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 4000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Lamzu - Thorn |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63 g | 52 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Lamzu - Thorn |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 90 hlead | 80 h |