Between the XM2we and X2V3, the XM2we comes out ahead in several specs, while the X2V3 wins on polling rate and battery. Overall, the XM2we scores 69.6 and the X2V3 scores 87.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2V3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 18.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
The XM2we doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the X2V3 if you care most about polling rate and battery. Its strongest claims are polling rate, battery, max dpi, among others.
Both ship with comparable wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2V3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Endgame Gear - XM2we wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Pulsar - X2V3 wins
- ▲Polling rate — 700.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Battery — 33.33% more. 120 h vs 90 h.
- ▲Max DPI — 23.08% more. 32000 vs 26000.
- ▲Weight — 8.00 g less. 55 vs 63.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 650 | 750lead |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63 g | 55 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 90 h | 120 hlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.