Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 3200 |
| Battery | 90 h | 70 h |
| Weight | 63 g | 75 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 5 |
Between the XM2we and EC3-CW, the XM2we comes out ahead in max dpi / battery, while the EC3-CW wins on several specs. Overall, the XM2we scores 62.6 and the EC3-CW scores 51.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The XM2we is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the XM2we if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi, battery, weight, among others. The single most decisive one: Max DPI — 712.50% more. 26000 vs 3200.
The EC3-CW similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the XM2we is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Endgame Gear - XM2we or BenQ - EC3-CW?
Endgame Gear - XM2we leads the current Mars Score by 11.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Endgame Gear - XM2we if…
Endgame Gear - XM2we has the measurable edge on max dpi, battery h, weight g.
Choose BenQ - EC3-CW if…
BenQ - EC3-CW does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Endgame Gear - XM2we wins
- ▲Max DPI — 712.50% more. 26000 vs 3200.
- ▲Battery — 28.57% more. 90 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Weight — 12.00 g less. 63 vs 75.
- ▲Buttons — 1.00 more. 6 vs 5.
Why BenQ - EC3-CW wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000lead | 3200 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 1000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63 glead | 75 g |
| Buttons | 6lead | 5 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Right-handed |
Connectivity
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 90 hlead | 70 h |