Between the Home Cinema 3800 and MoGo 3 Pro, the Home Cinema 3800 comes out ahead in brightness / resolution, while the MoGo 3 Pro wins on light source. Overall, the Home Cinema 3800 scores 80.1 and the MoGo 3 Pro scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Home Cinema 3800 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 45.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Home Cinema 3800 if you care most about brightness / resolution. The biggest gaps in its favor are brightness, resolution.
Pick the MoGo 3 Pro if you care most about light source. Its strongest claims are light source.
Both ship with comparable short-throw, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Home Cinema 3800 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Epson - Home Cinema 3800 wins
- ▲Brightness — 566.67% more. 3000 lm vs 450 lm.
- ▲Resolution: 4K (vs 1080p).
Why XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro wins
- ▲Light source: LED (vs Lamp).
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | Epson - Home Cinema 3800 | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1080p |
| Brightness | 3000 lmlead | 450 lm |
| Contrast | 100000:1 | 1500:1 |
| Light source | Lamp | LEDlead |
| Short-throw | false | false |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | Epson - Home Cinema 3800 | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | None | Google TV |
| HDMI inputs | 2lead | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.