Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Brightness | 4000 lm | 450 lm |
| Resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Short-throw | true | false |
Between the EpiqVision Ultra LS800 and MoGo 3 Pro, the EpiqVision Ultra LS800 comes out ahead in brightness / resolution, while the MoGo 3 Pro wins on several specs. Overall, the EpiqVision Ultra LS800 scores 82 and the MoGo 3 Pro scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The EpiqVision Ultra LS800 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 47.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the EpiqVision Ultra LS800 if you care most about brightness / resolution. The biggest gaps in its favor are brightness, resolution, light source, among others. The single most decisive one: Brightness — 788.89% more. 4000 lm vs 450 lm.
The MoGo 3 Pro similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the EpiqVision Ultra LS800 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 or XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro?
Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 leads the current Mars Score by 47.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare brightness, resolution, light source, short-throw against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 if…
Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 has the measurable edge on brightness lumens, resolution, light source.
Choose XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro if…
XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 wins
- ▲Brightness — 788.89% more. 4000 lm vs 450 lm.
- ▲Resolution: 4K (vs 1080p).
- ▲Light source: Laser (vs LED).
- ▲Short-throw: true (vs false).
Why XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1080p |
| Brightnessⓘ | 4000 lmlead | 450 lm |
| Contrast | 2500000:1 | 1500:1 |
| Light source | Laserlead | LED |
| Short-throw | truelead | false |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | Epson - EpiqVision Ultra LS800 | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | Android TV | Google TV |
| HDMI inputs | 3lead | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | true | true |