Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - CMF Phone 1 vs Nothing - Phone (3a)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
CMF Phone 1NOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
CMF Phone 1
61.4/ 100C
Performance47· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (3a)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (3a)
62.5/ 100C
Performance51· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the CMF Phone 1 and Phone (3a), the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the Phone (3a) wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the Phone (3a) scores 62.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (61.4 vs 62.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the CMF Phone 1 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density.

Pick the Phone (3a) if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, antutu, among others.

Both ship with comparable battery capacity, ram, main camera, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Nothing - CMF Phone 1 wins

  • Weight — 4.00 g less. 197 vs 201.
  • Pixel density — 2.07% more. 395 ppi vs 387 ppi.

Why Nothing - Phone (3a) wins

  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • Wired charging — 51.52% more. 50 W vs 33 W.
  • AnTuTu — 46.43% more. 820000 vs 560000.
  • Screen size — 1.50% more. 6.77 " vs 6.67 ".
  • Has Optical image stabilization.
  • Water resistance: IP64 (vs IP52).
  • Promised OS updates: 3 (vs 2).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
Weight197 glead201 g
Thickness8.2 mmlead8.4 mm
Water resistanceIP52IP64lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
Screen size6.67 "6.77 "lead
Pixel density395 ppilead387 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2000 nits3000 nitslead

Performance

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GBlead128 GB
AnTuTu560000820000lead
CPU total clock9.0 GHz10.8 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationfalsetruelead

Battery

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
Battery capacity5000 mAh5000 mAh
Wired charging33 W50 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W0 W

Connectivity

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slottrueleadfalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - CMF Phone 1Nothing - Phone (3a)
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates2 years3 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (3a)?+

Phone (3a) has 0.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5000 mAh.

Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (3a)?+

CMF Phone 1 is 4g lighter — 197g vs 201g.

Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+

CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.

Does Phone (3a) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (3a) supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (3a)?+

Phone (3a) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.