Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 16 vs Motorola - Razr 50

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 16APPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 16
57.4/ 100D
Performance61· 25%
Battery44· 20%
Display53· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Razr 50MOTOROLARENDER
Probe B
Motorola
Razr 50
60.2/ 100C
Performance49· 25%
Battery53· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 16 and Razr 50, the iPhone 16 comes out ahead in antutu and weight, while the Razr 50 wins on front camera and refresh rate. Overall, the iPhone 16 scores 57.4 and the Razr 50 scores 60.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (57.4 vs 60.2). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the iPhone 16 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are antutu, weight, pixel density, among others.

Pick the Razr 50 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, refresh rate, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, 5g support, optical image stabilization, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Apple - iPhone 16 wins

  • AnTuTu — 107.69% more. 1620000 vs 780000.
  • Weight — 18.00 g less. 170 vs 188.
  • Pixel density — 11.38% more. 460 ppi vs 413 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 3).

Why Motorola - Razr 50 wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Wired charging — 25.00% more. 25 W vs 20 W.
  • Battery capacity — 17.94% more. 4200 mAh vs 3561 mAh.
  • Screen size — 13.11% more. 6.9 " vs 6.1 ".
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
  • Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
Weight170 glead188 g
Thickness7.8 mm7.3 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_clamshelllead

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
Screen size6.1 "6.9 "lead
Pixel density460 ppilead413 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hzlead
Peak brightness2000 nits3000 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage128 GB256 GBlead
AnTuTu1620000lead780000
CPU total clock17.0 GHzlead9.6 GHz

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
Main camera48 MP50 MPlead
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
Battery capacity3561 mAh4200 mAhlead
Wired charging20 W25 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W15 W

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 16Motorola - Razr 50
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates5 yearslead3 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 16 or Razr 50?+

Razr 50 has 17.9% more battery — 3561 mAh vs 4200 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 16 or Razr 50?+

iPhone 16 is 18g lighter — 170g vs 188g.

Is iPhone 16 waterproof?+

iPhone 16 has an IP68 rating.

Does Razr 50 support 5G?+

Yes, Razr 50 supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 or Razr 50?+

Razr 50 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.