Between the Pacer Pro and Ocean, the Pacer Pro comes out ahead in gps mode, while the Ocean wins on smartwatch mode and multi-band gps. Overall, the Pacer Pro scores 39.7 and the Ocean scores 41.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (39.7 vs 41.3). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Pacer Pro if you care most about gps mode. The biggest gaps in its favor are gps mode.
Pick the Ocean if you care most about smartwatch mode and multi-band gps. Its strongest claims are smartwatch mode, multi-band gps.
Both ship with comparable solar charging, ecg, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Polar - Pacer Pro wins
- ▲GPS mode — 16.67% more. 35 h vs 30 h.
Why Suunto - Ocean wins
- ▲Smartwatch mode — 42.86% more. 10 days vs 7 days.
- ▲Has Multi-band GPS.
Spec comparison
GPS & Sensors
| Spec | Polar - Pacer Pro | Suunto - Ocean |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-band GPS | false | truelead |
| Barometric altimeter | true | true |
| Heart rate | true | true |
| ECG | false | false |
| Pulse Ox | false | truelead |
Battery
| Spec | Polar - Pacer Pro | Suunto - Ocean |
|---|---|---|
| Smartwatch mode | 7 days | 10 dayslead |
| GPS mode | 35 hlead | 30 h |
| Solar charging | false | false |
Design
| Spec | Polar - Pacer Pro | Suunto - Ocean |
|---|---|---|
| Case size | 45 mm | 49 mmlead |
| Weight | 41 glead | 78 g |
| Water resistanceⓘ | 5 ATM | 30 ATMlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.