Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
| Weight | 39 g | 61 g |
| Wireless | true | false |
| Battery | 100 h | 0 h |
Between the ULX and Pulsefire Haste 2, the ULX comes out ahead in weight / wireless, while the Pulsefire Haste 2 wins on polling rate. Overall, the ULX scores 71.9 and the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 73.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (71.9 vs 73.9). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the ULX if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, wireless, battery. The single most decisive one: Weight — 22.00 g less. 39 vs 61.
Pick the Pulsefire Haste 2 if you care most about polling rate. Its strongest claims are polling rate. The single most decisive one: Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Finalmouse - ULX or HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2?
HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 leads the current Mars Score by 2.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare polling rate, weight, wireless against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Finalmouse - ULX if…
Finalmouse - ULX has the measurable edge on weight g, is wireless, battery h.
Choose HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 if…
HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 has the measurable edge on polling rate hz.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Finalmouse - ULX wins
- ▲Weight — 22.00 g less. 39 vs 61.
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 100 h vs 0 h.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 39 glead | 61 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | truelead | false |
| Battery | 100 hlead | 0 h |