ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P
Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and AORUS FO32U2P, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and peak brightness, while the AORUS FO32U2P wins on several specs. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ROG Swift PG39WCDM edges ahead on the Mars Score (79.8 vs 73.2), but the 6.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, peak brightness, screen size.
The AORUS FO32U2P similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 21.88% more. 39 " vs 32 ".
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 39 "lead | 32 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nitslead | 1000 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 2lead |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or AORUS FO32U2P?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or AORUS FO32U2P?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or AORUS FO32U2P have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 65W on AORUS FO32U2P.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.