vsMars
Face à face

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B

Dernière mise à jour · Comment fonctionne le Mars Score
ROG Swift PG39WCDMASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
ROG Swift PG39WCDM
79.8/ 100A
Performance84· 45%
Panel75· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
UltraGear 32GS95UE-BLGRENDER
Probe B
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Verdict rapide

Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and screen size, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins on several specs. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.

Conseil d’achat

Lequel choisir ?

The ROG Swift PG39WCDM edges ahead on the Mars Score (79.8 vs 72.5), but the 7.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others.

The UltraGear 32GS95UE-B similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Pourquoi ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM gagne

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
  • ▲Screen size — 23.81% more. 39 " vs 31.5 ".
  • ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
  • ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).

Pourquoi LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B gagne

  • No decisive advantages.
Fiche complète

Comparaison des specs

Panel

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Screen sizeⓘ39 "lead31.5 "
Panel typeⓘQD-OLEDleadOLED
Resolutionⓘ1440p4Klead
Aspect ratioⓘ21:916:9
Curvedⓘtrueleadfalse

Performance

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Refresh rateⓘ240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nits1300 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ99 %lead98.5 %
HDRⓘtruetrue
G-Syncⓘtruetrue
FreeSyncⓘtruetrue

Connectivity

SpecASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDMLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 Wlead65 W
KVMtrueleadfalse
Questions des lecteurs

Questions fréquentes

Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.

Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B.

En détail

Analyses spec par spec

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
Par fabricant

Plus des mêmes marques

ASUS →4
LG →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.