Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · Response time (GtG)

UltraGear 27GP950-B vs Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)

A side-by-side readout for response time (gtg).

LG · UltraGear 27GP950-B
1ms
Samsung · Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
0.03ms
▲ Lead
VerdictOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on response time (gtg).
Context

Understanding response time (gtg)

Response time (GtG) is a numeric spec measured in ms. On this metric, lower values are generally better — smaller, lighter, thinner, or less demanding usually translates to a more comfortable or more efficient product. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs response time (gtg) together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

This matchupUltraGear 27GP950-B's 1ms is roughly 3233% more than Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)'s 0.03ms (a 0.97ms gap). Lower is better here, so Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) takes the lead in real use.

Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Moniteurs category for all products ranked by Mars Score.