Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) vs Dell - XPS 16 (9650)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Gram Pro 17 (2024)LGRENDER
Probe A
LG
Gram Pro 17 (2024)
73.5/ 100B
Performance60· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
XPS 16 (9650)DELLRENDER
Probe B
Dell
XPS 16 (9650)
76.7/ 100B
Performance65· 35%
Battery & Ports95· 27%
Design· 20%
Display71· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the Gram Pro 17 (2024) and XPS 16 (9650), the Gram Pro 17 (2024) comes out ahead in claimed battery life and refresh rate, while the XPS 16 (9650) wins on ram and battery. Overall, the Gram Pro 17 (2024) scores 73.5 and the XPS 16 (9650) scores 76.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The XPS 16 (9650) edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.5 vs 76.7), but the 3.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Gram Pro 17 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are claimed battery life, refresh rate, screen size, among others.

Pick the XPS 16 (9650) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are ram, battery, thunderbolt ports, among others.

Both ship with comparable storage, cpu cores, backlit keyboard, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) wins

  • Claimed battery life — 38.46% more. 18 h vs 13 h.
  • Refresh rate — 20.00% more. 144 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Screen size — 4.29% more. 17 " vs 16.3 ".
  • Weight — 0.64 kg less. 1.49 vs 2.13.

Why Dell - XPS 16 (9650) wins

  • RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
  • Battery — 10.56% more. 99.5 Wh vs 90 Wh.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 1.00 more. 3 vs 2.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecLG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)Dell - XPS 16 (9650)
Weight1.49 kglead2.13 kg
Thickness12.4 mmlead18.7 mm
Build materialmagnesiumaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readertruetrue

Display

SpecLG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)Dell - XPS 16 (9650)
Screen size17 "lead16.3 "
Refresh rate144 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecLG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)Dell - XPS 16 (9650)
CPUIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core Ultra 9 285H
CPU cores1616
GPUNVIDIA RTX 3050 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
RAM16 GB32 GBlead
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecLG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)Dell - XPS 16 (9650)
Battery90 Wh99.5 Whlead
Claimed battery life18 hlead13 h
USB-C ports13lead
Thunderbolt ports23lead
HDMItrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, Gram Pro 17 (2024) or XPS 16 (9650)?+

Gram Pro 17 (2024) claims up to 18 hours — 18h vs 13h.

Which is lighter, Gram Pro 17 (2024) or XPS 16 (9650)?+

Gram Pro 17 (2024) is lighter at 1.49 kg vs 2.13 kg.

Which has more RAM, Gram Pro 17 (2024) or XPS 16 (9650)?+

XPS 16 (9650) offers 32GB of RAM.

Which has an OLED display, Gram Pro 17 (2024) or XPS 16 (9650)?+

XPS 16 (9650) has an OLED display; Gram Pro 17 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.