Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) vs MSI - MPG 321URX

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual…LGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
MPG 321URXMSIRENDER
Probe B
MSI
MPG 321URX
73.2/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) and MPG 321URX, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) comes out ahead in peak brightness, while the MPG 321URX wins on usb-c power delivery and screen size. Overall, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (72.5 vs 73.2). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness.

Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins

  • Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.

Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
  • Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
Screen size31.5 "32 "lead
Panel typeOLEDQD-OLEDlead
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightness1300 nitslead1000 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctruetrue
FreeSynctruetrue

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 321URX
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W98 Wlead
KVMfalsetruelead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX?+

MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX?+

MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.

Does UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), 98W on MPG 321URX.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.