Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) vs MSI - MPG 271QRX

Last updated · How Mars Score works
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual…LGRENDER
Probe A
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
MPG 271QRXMSIRENDER
Probe B
MSI
MPG 271QRX
70.8/ 100B
Performance88· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) and MPG 271QRX, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) comes out ahead in peak brightness and screen size, while the MPG 271QRX wins on usb-c power delivery and refresh rate. Overall, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 and the MPG 271QRX scores 70.8 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (72.5 vs 70.8). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, screen size.

Pick the MPG 271QRX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, refresh rate, dci-p3 coverage, among others.

Both ship with comparable response time (gtg), g-sync, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins

  • Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
  • Screen size — 16.67% more. 31.5 " vs 27 ".

Why MSI - MPG 271QRX wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
  • Refresh rate — 50.00% more. 360 Hz vs 240 Hz.
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 271QRX
Screen size31.5 "lead27 "
Panel typeOLEDQD-OLEDlead
Resolution4Klead1440p
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 271QRX
Refresh rate240 Hz360 Hzlead
Response time (GtG)0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightness1300 nitslead1000 nits
DCI-P3 coverage98.5 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctruetrue
FreeSynctruetrue

Connectivity

SpecLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode)MSI - MPG 271QRX
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W98 Wlead
KVMfalsetruelead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 271QRX?+

MPG 271QRX refreshes at 360Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 271QRX?+

MPG 271QRX responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.

Does UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 271QRX have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), 98W on MPG 271QRX.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.