Between the Omen Transcend 16 and XPS 16 (9650), the Omen Transcend 16 comes out ahead in refresh rate, while the XPS 16 (9650) wins on claimed battery life and battery. Overall, the Omen Transcend 16 scores 79.8 and the XPS 16 (9650) scores 76.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Omen Transcend 16 edges ahead on the Mars Score (79.8 vs 76.7), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Omen Transcend 16 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate.
Pick the XPS 16 (9650) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, battery, thunderbolt ports, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, storage, cpu cores, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why HP - Omen Transcend 16 wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
Why Dell - XPS 16 (9650) wins
- ▲Claimed battery life — 30.00% more. 13 h vs 10 h.
- ▲Battery — 2.58% more. 99.5 Wh vs 97 Wh.
- ▲Thunderbolt ports — 2.00 more. 3 vs 1.
- ▲Screen size — 1.88% more. 16.3 " vs 16 ".
- ▲Weight — 0.03 kg less. 2.13 vs 2.16.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | HP - Omen Transcend 16 | Dell - XPS 16 (9650) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.16 kg | 2.13 kglead |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18.7 mmlead |
| Build material | aluminum | aluminum |
| Backlit keyboard | true | true |
| Fingerprint reader | true | true |
Display
| Spec | HP - Omen Transcend 16 | Dell - XPS 16 (9650) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 16 " | 16.3 "lead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLED | OLED |
Performance
| Spec | HP - Omen Transcend 16 | Dell - XPS 16 (9650) |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| GPUⓘ | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| RAMⓘ | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Storageⓘ | 1024 GB | 1024 GB |
| Storage typeⓘ | SSD | SSD |
Battery & Ports
| Spec | HP - Omen Transcend 16 | Dell - XPS 16 (9650) |
|---|---|---|
| Batteryⓘ | 97 Wh | 99.5 Whlead |
| Claimed battery life | 10 h | 13 hlead |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3lead |
| Thunderbolt portsⓘ | 1 | 3lead |
| HDMI | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery life, Omen Transcend 16 or XPS 16 (9650)?+
XPS 16 (9650) claims up to 13 hours — 10h vs 13h.
Which is lighter, Omen Transcend 16 or XPS 16 (9650)?+
XPS 16 (9650) is lighter at 2.13 kg vs 2.16 kg.
Which has an OLED display, Omen Transcend 16 or XPS 16 (9650)?+
Both have OLED displays.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.