Between the ProArt PA32UCXR and UltraSharp U3225QE, the ProArt PA32UCXR comes out ahead in peak brightness and screen size, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery and dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the ProArt PA32UCXR scores 65.4 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (65.4 vs 65.3). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the ProArt PA32UCXR if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, screen size, freesync.
Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery and dci-p3 coverage. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, dci-p3 coverage.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), panel type, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 255.56% more. 1600 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲Has FreeSync.
Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 45.83% more. 140 W vs 96 W.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1600 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS - ProArt PA32UCXR | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 3lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 96 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, ProArt PA32UCXR or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
UltraSharp U3225QE refreshes at 120Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, ProArt PA32UCXR or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
UltraSharp U3225QE responds in 5ms vs 5ms.
Does ProArt PA32UCXR or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on ProArt PA32UCXR, 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.