Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo - X200

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy S26 UltraSAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S26 Ultra
75.6/ 100B
Performance77· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras92· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200VIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200
71.7/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy S26 Ultra and X200, the Galaxy S26 Ultra comes out ahead in main camera and ram, while the X200 wins on front camera and wireless charging. Overall, the Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 75.6 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Galaxy S26 Ultra edges ahead on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 71.7), but the 3.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Galaxy S26 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are main camera, ram, pixel density, among others.

Pick the X200 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wireless charging, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, water resistance, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra wins

  • Main camera — 300.00% more. 200 MP vs 50 MP.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Pixel density — 8.91% more. 501 ppi vs 460 ppi.
  • Screen size — 3.45% more. 6.9 " vs 6.67 ".
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 4).

Why Vivo - X200 wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
  • Wired charging — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
  • Weight — 30.00 g less. 202 vs 232.
  • Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • AnTuTu — 13.42% more. 2620000 vs 2310000.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
Weight232 g202 glead
Thickness8.6 mm8.0 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
Screen size6.9 "lead6.67 "
Pixel density501 ppilead460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
RAM16 GBlead12 GB
Storage512 GBlead256 GB
AnTuTu23100002620000lead
CPU total clock22.8 GHzlead22.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
Main camera200 MPlead50 MP
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
Battery capacity5000 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging65 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraVivo - X200
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy S26 Ultra or X200?+

X200 has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S26 Ultra or X200?+

X200 is 30g lighter — 232g vs 202g.

Is Galaxy S26 Ultra waterproof?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 support 5G?+

Yes, X200 supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Galaxy S26 Ultra or X200?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S26 Ultra or X200?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 200 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.