Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Garmin - Enduro 3 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPS mode | 320 h | 35 h |
| Smartwatch mode | 36 days | 7 days |
| Multi-band GPS | true | false |
| Solar charging | true | false |
Between the Enduro 3 and Pacer Pro, the Enduro 3 comes out ahead in gps mode / smartwatch mode, while the Pacer Pro wins on several specs. Overall, the Enduro 3 scores 82.6 and the Pacer Pro scores 44.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Enduro 3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 38.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Enduro 3 if you care most about gps mode / smartwatch mode. The biggest gaps in its favor are gps mode, smartwatch mode, multi-band gps, among others. The single most decisive one: GPS mode — 814.29% more. 320 h vs 35 h.
The Pacer Pro similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable ecg, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Enduro 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Garmin - Enduro 3 or Polar - Pacer Pro?
Garmin - Enduro 3 leads the current Mars Score by 38.1 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare smartwatch mode, gps mode against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Garmin - Enduro 3 if…
Garmin - Enduro 3 has the measurable edge on battery gps hours, battery smartwatch days, has multiband gps.
Choose Polar - Pacer Pro if…
Polar - Pacer Pro does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Garmin - Enduro 3 wins
- ▲GPS mode — 814.29% more. 320 h vs 35 h.
- ▲Smartwatch mode — 414.29% more. 36 days vs 7 days.
- ▲Has Multi-band GPS.
- ▲Has Solar charging.
Why Polar - Pacer Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
GPS & Sensors
| Spec | Garmin - Enduro 3 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-band GPS | truelead | false |
| Barometric altimeter | true | true |
| Heart rate | true | true |
| ECG | false | false |
| Pulse Ox | truelead | false |
Battery
| Spec | Garmin - Enduro 3 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smartwatch mode | 36 dayslead | 7 days |
| GPS mode | 320 hlead | 35 h |
| Solar charging | truelead | false |
Design
| Spec | Garmin - Enduro 3 | Polar - Pacer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Case size | 51 mmlead | 45 mm |
| Weight | 63 g | 41 glead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | 10 ATMlead | 5 ATM |