HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 vs Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 4000 Hz |
| Weight | 61 g | 49 g |
| Wireless | false | true |
| Battery | 0 h | 70 h |
Between the Pulsefire Haste 2 and Atlantis Mini Pro, the Pulsefire Haste 2 comes out ahead in polling rate, while the Atlantis Mini Pro wins on weight / wireless. Overall, the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 73.9 and the Atlantis Mini Pro scores 70 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pulsefire Haste 2 edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.9 vs 70), but the 3.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Pulsefire Haste 2 if you care most about polling rate. The biggest gaps in its favor are polling rate. The single most decisive one: Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Pick the Atlantis Mini Pro if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, wireless, battery. The single most decisive one: Weight — 12.00 g less. 49 vs 61.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 or Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro?
HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 leads the current Mars Score by 3.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare polling rate, weight, wireless against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 if…
HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 has the measurable edge on polling rate hz.
Choose Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro if…
Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro has the measurable edge on weight g, is wireless, battery h.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Why Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro wins
- ▲Weight — 12.00 g less. 49 vs 61.
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 70 h vs 0 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hzlead | 4000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 61 g | 49 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Atlantis Mini Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 70 hlead |