Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Maya X |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 30000 |
| Weight | 61 g | 47 g |
| Wireless | false | true |
| Battery | 0 h | 80 h |
Between the Pulsefire Haste 2 and Maya X, the Pulsefire Haste 2 comes out ahead in several specs, while the Maya X wins on max dpi / weight. Overall, the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 73.9 and the Maya X scores 77.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Maya X edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.9 vs 77.7), but the 3.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The Pulsefire Haste 2 does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Maya X if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are max dpi, weight, wireless, among others. The single most decisive one: Max DPI — 15.38% more. 30000 vs 26000.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 or Lamzu - Maya X?
Lamzu - Maya X leads the current Mars Score by 3.8 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, weight, wireless against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 if…
HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Lamzu - Maya X if…
Lamzu - Maya X has the measurable edge on max dpi, weight g, is wireless.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Lamzu - Maya X wins
- ▲Max DPI — 15.38% more. 30000 vs 26000.
- ▲Weight — 14.00 g less. 47 vs 61.
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 80 h vs 0 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Maya X |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 30000lead |
| Max IPS | 650 | 750lead |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Maya X |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 61 g | 47 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Lamzu - Maya X |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 80 hlead |