Between the Pulsefire Haste 2 and X2V2 Mini, the Pulsefire Haste 2 comes out ahead in several specs, while the X2V2 Mini wins on weight and wireless. Overall, the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 84.6 and the X2V2 Mini scores 86.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (84.6 vs 86.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The Pulsefire Haste 2 doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the X2V2 Mini if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, wireless, battery.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, polling rate, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- ▲Weight — 9.00 g less. 52 vs 61.
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 70 h vs 0 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 61 g | 52 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 70 hlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.