Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo vs Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (digital + print) | true | false |
Between the Instax mini Evo and Lomo'Instant Automat Glass, the Instax mini Evo comes out ahead in hybrid (digital + print), while the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass wins on several specs. Overall, the Instax mini Evo scores 91.4 and the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass scores 75 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Instax mini Evo is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Instax mini Evo if you care most about hybrid (digital + print). The biggest gaps in its favor are hybrid (digital + print). The single most decisive one: Has Hybrid (digital + print).
The Lomo'Instant Automat Glass similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable film format, double exposure, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Instax mini Evo is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo or Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass?
Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo leads the current Mars Score by 16.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare hybrid (digital + print) against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo if…
Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo has the measurable edge on is hybrid.
Choose Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass if…
Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo wins
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
Why Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax mini | Instax mini |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | truelead | false |
Features
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | false | truelead |
| Double exposure | true | true |
| Lens count | 1 | 3lead |
Design
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax mini Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 285 glead | 440 g |