Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 vs Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (digital + print) | false | true |
| Film format | Instax square | ZINK |
Between the Instax SQUARE SQ1 and Mini Shot 3 Square Retro, the Instax SQUARE SQ1 comes out ahead in several specs, while the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro wins on hybrid (digital + print) / film format. Overall, the Instax SQUARE SQ1 scores 80.4 and the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro scores 83 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (80.4 vs 83). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The Instax SQUARE SQ1 does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if you care most about hybrid (digital + print) / film format. Its strongest claims are hybrid (digital + print), film format. The single most decisive one: Has Hybrid (digital + print).
Both ship with comparable double exposure, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 or Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro?
Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro leads the current Mars Score by 2.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare film format, hybrid (digital + print) against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 if…
Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if…
Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro has the measurable edge on is hybrid, film format.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro wins
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
- ▲Film format: ZINK (vs Instax square).
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax square | ZINKlead |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | false | truelead |
Features
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | true | true |
| Double exposure | false | false |
| Lens count | 1 | 1 |
Design
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax SQUARE SQ1 | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 390 g | 365 glead |