Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo vs Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (digital + print) | true | false |
| Film format | Instax wide | Instax mini |
Between the Instax Wide Evo and Lomo'Instant Automat Glass, the Instax Wide Evo comes out ahead in hybrid (digital + print) / film format, while the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass wins on several specs. Overall, the Instax Wide Evo scores 69.4 and the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass scores 75 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Lomo'Instant Automat Glass edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.4 vs 75), but the 5.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Instax Wide Evo if you care most about hybrid (digital + print) / film format. The biggest gaps in its favor are hybrid (digital + print), film format. The single most decisive one: Has Hybrid (digital + print).
The Lomo'Instant Automat Glass similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable double exposure, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo or Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass?
Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass leads the current Mars Score by 5.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare film format, hybrid (digital + print) against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo if…
Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo has the measurable edge on is hybrid, film format.
Choose Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass if…
Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo wins
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
- ▲Film format: Instax wide (vs Instax mini).
Why Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax widelead | Instax mini |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | truelead | false |
Features
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | false | truelead |
| Double exposure | true | true |
| Lens count | 1 | 3lead |
Design
| Spec | Fujifilm - Instax Wide Evo | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 490 g | 440 glead |