Between the iPhone 17 Pro Max and X200 Pro, the iPhone 17 Pro Max comes out ahead in screen size and pixel density, while the X200 Pro wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max scores 67.5 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.5 vs 74), but the 6.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the iPhone 17 Pro Max if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X200 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, optical image stabilization, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max wins
- ▲Screen size — 1.77% more. 6.9 " vs 6.78 ".
- ▲Pixel density — 1.77% more. 460 ppi vs 452 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins
- ▲Wired charging — 200.00% more. 90 W vs 30 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
- ▲AnTuTu — 30.48% more. 2740000 vs 2100000.
- ▲Battery capacity — 28.07% more. 6000 mAh vs 4685 mAh.
- ▲Wireless charging — 20.00% more. 30 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
- ▲Weight — 4.00 g less. 223 vs 227.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 227 g | 223 glead |
| Thickness | 8.3 mmlead | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP69lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.78 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2200 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4685 mAh | 6000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 30 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 25 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 17 Pro Max | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 6 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has 28.1% more battery — 4685 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro is 4g lighter — 227g vs 223g.
Is iPhone 17 Pro Max waterproof?+
iPhone 17 Pro Max has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 17 Pro Max or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.