Between the Alienware AW3225QF and Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the Alienware AW3225QF comes out ahead in g-sync, while the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on screen size and usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Alienware AW3225QF scores 72.8 and the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Alienware AW3225QF if you care most about g-sync. The biggest gaps in its favor are g-sync.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), peak brightness, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Dell - Alienware AW3225QFが勝つ理由
- ▲Has G-Sync.
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)が勝つ理由
- ▲Screen size — 55.06% more. 49 " vs 31.6 ".
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery: 65 W vs 0 W.
スペック比較
Panel
| スペック | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 31.6 " | 49 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 5Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | true | true |
Performance
| スペック | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| スペック | Dell - Alienware AW3225QF | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | false | truelead |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 0 W | 65 Wlead |
| KVM | false | truelead |
よくある質問
Which has higher refresh rate, Alienware AW3225QF or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, Alienware AW3225QF or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does Alienware AW3225QF or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) offers USB-C with 65W power delivery.
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.