Between the PD2730S and Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the PD2730S comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery, while the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) wins on refresh rate and peak brightness. Overall, the PD2730S scores 59 and the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) scores 89 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
The Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 30.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the PD2730S if you care most about usb-c power delivery. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery.
Pick the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
BenQ - PD2730Sが勝つ理由
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)が勝つ理由
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 81.48% more. 49 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
スペック比較
Panel
| スペック | BenQ - PD2730S | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 49 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 5K | 5K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | truelead |
Performance
| スペック | BenQ - PD2730S | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 60 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 400 nits | 1000 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| スペック | BenQ - PD2730S | Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 96 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | true | true |
よくある質問
Which has higher refresh rate, PD2730S or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, PD2730S or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does PD2730S or Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on PD2730S, 65W on Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC).
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.