Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs HP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C

Last updated · How Mars Score works
AORUS FO32U2PGIGABYTERENDER
Probe A
Gigabyte
AORUS FO32U2P
73.2/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Z27k G3 4K USB-CHPRENDER
Probe B
HP
Z27k G3 4K USB-C
59.0/ 100C
Performance67· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the AORUS FO32U2P and Z27k G3 4K USB-C, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in refresh rate and peak brightness, while the Z27k G3 4K USB-C wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the Z27k G3 4K USB-C scores 59 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The AORUS FO32U2P is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the Z27k G3 4K USB-C if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the AORUS FO32U2P is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins

  • Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
  • Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).

Why HP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 53.85% more. 100 W vs 65 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecGigabyte - AORUS FO32U2PHP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C
Screen size32 "lead27 "
Panel typeQD-OLEDleadIPS
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecGigabyte - AORUS FO32U2PHP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C
Refresh rate240 Hzlead60 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 mslead5 ms
Peak brightness1000 nitslead400 nits
DCI-P3 coverage99 %lead98 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecGigabyte - AORUS FO32U2PHP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports2lead1
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery65 W100 Wlead
KVMtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or Z27k G3 4K USB-C?+

AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or Z27k G3 4K USB-C?+

AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does AORUS FO32U2P or Z27k G3 4K USB-C have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 100W on Z27k G3 4K USB-C.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.