Between the AORUS FO32U2P and UltraGear 27GP950-B, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in response time (gtg) and peak brightness, while the UltraGear 27GP950-B wins on several specs. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 27GP950-B edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 78.2), but the 5.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), peak brightness, refresh rate, among others.
The UltraGear 27GP950-B similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GP950-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
- ▲Peak brightness — 66.67% more. 1000 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 50.00% more. 240 Hz vs 160 Hz.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 160 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 1 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 600 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | truelead | false |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | — |
| KVM | truelead | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GP950-B?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 160Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GP950-B?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 1ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 27GP950-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
AORUS FO32U2P offers USB-C with 65W power delivery.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.