Between the M27Q X and UltraSharp U3225QE, the M27Q X comes out ahead in refresh rate and response time (gtg), while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery and screen size. Overall, the M27Q X scores 65.7 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (65.7 vs 65.3). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the M27Q X if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, among others.
Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, screen size, peak brightness, among others.
Both ship with comparable panel type, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Gigabyte - M27Q Xが勝つ理由
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 94.00% less. 0.3 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
Dell - UltraSharp U3225QEが勝つ理由
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 833.33% more. 140 W vs 15 W.
- ▲Screen size — 16.67% more. 31.5 " vs 27 ".
- ▲Peak brightness — 12.50% more. 450 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 7.61% more. 99 % vs 92 %.
スペック比較
Panel
| スペック | Gigabyte - M27Q X | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 31.5 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| スペック | Gigabyte - M27Q X | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.3 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 400 nits | 450 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 92 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| スペック | Gigabyte - M27Q X | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 15 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
よくある質問
Which has higher refresh rate, M27Q X or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
M27Q X refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, M27Q X or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
M27Q X responds in 0.3ms vs 5ms.
Does M27Q X or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 15W on M27Q X, 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.